Cycling Vs Running: Which Improves Fitness Faster?

Cycling Vs Running: Which Improves Fitness Faster?

Brenton Barker

Jan 26, 2025

Cycling vs running

Cycling Vs Running: Which Improves Fitness Faster?

Cycling Vs Running: Which Improves Fitness Faster?

Jan 26, 2025

Cycling vs running

Cycling Vs Running: Which Improves Fitness Faster?

Cycling Vs Running: Which Improves Fitness Faster?

Brenton Barker

Jan 26, 2025

Cycling vs running

When it comes to building fitness, cycling and running are two of the most effective activities. However, if you're short on time, which one provides the best results? 

Whether your goals are to burn calories, improve cardiovascular health, or build endurance, each option offers unique benefits. In this guide, we’ll compare cycling and running to determine which one helps you get fitter faster, both in the short term and over the long run. 

If you want to decide where to focus your efforts for maximum gains, keep reading.

Core Differences Between Cycling and Running

Cycling and running are both popular forms of exercise, each with unique advantages that cater to different preferences. Understanding their differences in terms of time efficiency, muscular impact, and costs can help you choose the best option for you.

Time and Efficiency


  • Cycling is generally more time-efficient for covering distances, allowing you to travel greater distances in a shorter period. This makes cycling an excellent choice for exploring outdoor trails or commuting. 


  • Running, on the other hand, can provide an efficient workout that significantly improves cardiovascular fitness in less time, making it ideal if you’re a time-crunched athlete,

Muscular Impact


  • Cycling is a low-impact exercise that reduces stress on your joints, making it a safer option if you're recovering from injuries or dealing with conditions like arthritis. Cycling primarily engages the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves, glutes, and the core. 


  • Running is a high-impact exercise that works for nearly all muscle groups in the body, including the upper body. While this engagement can improve overall strength, it also increases the risk of joint stress and injury, especially for beginners or if you run with poor form.

Upfront Costs 


  • Cycling typically involves a higher upfront cost due to the purchase of a bike, safety gear (such as helmets and lights), and maintenance expenses. However, cycling can serve dual purposes, functioning as both exercise and transportation, which can help offset some of these costs over time.


  • Running requires minimal equipment, primarily a quality pair of running shoes and suitable clothing. But, you typically need to replace your running shoes every 300 to 500 miles (500 - 800k) which can add up if you’re running a lot. 

Benefits of Cycling

Cycling offers a range of distinctive benefits, including:

Extended Travel Opportunities: It allows you to cover more distance in less time, making it perfect for long rides or exploring new areas.

Joint-Friendly Activity: Its low-impact nature makes it suitable if you have joint issues or are recovering from injuries.

Heart Rate Management: Cycling provides better control for maintaining steady-state cardio or engaging in High-Intensity interval training (HIIT)

Customizable Workouts: You can adjust resistance and speed to meet specific fitness goals.

Versatility: Cycling serves both as exercise and a mode of transportation.

Family Inclusion: Cycling is an activity that people of all ages and fitness levels can enjoy. I absolutely cherish riding with my daughter.

Enhanced Endurance with Reduced Fatigue: Cycling builds aerobic capacity while minimizing excessive strain on your muscles.

Lower Risk of Overuse Injuries: The smooth pedaling motion reduces repetitive stress, making it a safer option in the long run (pun intended).

Benefits of Running

If you’re looking to integrate running into your cycling program, it boasts several noteworthy benefits, including:

Simplicity and Accessibility: Running requires minimal equipment and can be performed almost anywhere.

High Caloric Expenditure: Running is an efficient method for burning calories and facilitating weight loss.

Bone Strengthening: The impact of running helps promote bone density over time.

Cardiovascular Enhancement: It quickly elevates your heart rate and improves overall heart health.

Comprehensive Muscle Engagement: Running works a broader range of muscles, including your upper body.

Mental Health Benefits: It triggers the release of endorphins, which can alleviate stress and boost your mood.

Efficient Workouts: Running delivers powerful results in shorter periods.

Accessibility for All Fitness Levels: The intensity of running can be adapted to accommodate your level of fitness.

Does Cycling or Running Burn More Calories?

The calories you’ll burn varies between cycling and running based on factors such as intensity, body weight, and fitness level. Generally, running burns more calories per hour compared to cycling at a moderate pace due to its weight-bearing nature and greater muscle engagement.

For instance, a 154 lb (70 kg) individual burns approximately:

  • Running (6 mph or 10 km/h): ~ 600-700 calories per hour.

  • Cycling (12-14 mph or 19-22 km/h): ~ 400-500 calories per hour.

At higher intensities, the difference narrows. Cycling at 19 mph (30 km/h) can burn up to 850 calories per hour, which is comparable to running at faster speeds of 7.5 mph (12 km/h) or more.

Comparison of Time Required

To match the calorie burn of 1 hour of running at 6 mph (10 km/h), a 70 kg individual would need to ride for approximately:

  • 1.5 hours at 12-14 mph (19-22 km/h), or 

  • 1 hour at 15-19 mph (25-30 km/h).

This difference highlights the efficiency of running for calorie burn in shorter durations, while cycling may feel less strenuous, allowing for longer sessions.

Which is More Effective for Getting Fit?

Deciding whether cycling or running is more effective for fitness depends on your goals, physical condition, and personal preferences. Here’s a breakdown based on different fitness aspects.

Cardiovascular Fitness

Both activities improve heart health, but running provides a quicker cardiovascular boost due to its higher intensity and ability to elevate heart rate rapidly. Cycling allows for more control over heart rate zones, making it suitable for long-duration, steady-state cardio or interval training.

Verdict: Running is slightly more effective for quick cardiovascular improvements, while cycling is better for endurance-focused cardio with less fatigue.

Muscular Strength and Endurance

Running engages a wider range of muscles, including the core, arms, and upper body, but it places more repetitive stress on your joints. Cycling, being lower impact, focuses heavily on the lower-body muscles, particularly the quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves, thereby building muscular endurance and strength over time.

Verdict: Cycling is more effective for building leg strength and endurance while running provides a full-body workout.

Calorie Burn and Weight Loss

As mentioned earlier, running burns more calories per hour, making it more time-efficient for weight loss. However, cycling can be sustained for longer durations and is easier on the body, allowing for greater overall weight loss during extended sessions.

Verdict: Running is better for calorie burn in shorter workouts, while cycling is ideal for those who prefer prolonged, less intense sessions.

Joint Impact and Recovery

Cycling is low-impact, making it more suitable for individuals with joint issues or those recovering from injuries. Running’s high-impact nature can strengthen bones, but it may also lead to overuse injuries, such as shin splints or knee pain, without proper form and recovery.

Verdict: Cycling is preferable for joint health and recovery, while running offers bone-strengthening benefits.

Practicality and Consistency

Running is simpler to incorporate into a routine, requiring minimal equipment and preparation. Cycling, with its higher initial costs and dependency on weather or terrain, can present logistical challenges, although indoor cycling options can alleviate some issues.

Verdict: Running is more practical for most people, but cycling offers versatility and can serve as transportation.

Overall Effectiveness

If your goal is weight loss or cardiovascular fitness in a short amount of time, running is generally more effective. However, if you aim to build endurance, protect your joints, or engage in longer, less intense workouts, cycling is a better long-term option. 

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual goals and preferences. A combination of both activities can provide a balanced approach to fitness, utilizing the unique benefits of each.

The Efficient Training Solution

When it comes to efficient training, both cycling and running have their advantages, but cycling offers unique benefits for those seeking a well-rounded and adaptable approach to fitness. 

Cycling's lower impact reduces injuries and allows for longer workouts that build endurance without straining the body. However, successful cycling training requires a balance of intensity, volume, and recovery to avoid overtraining and injuries, which are challenges that many cyclists encounter. 

That's where JOIN comes in. JOIN is a world-class cycling training tool designed to adapt to your specific needs, schedule, and fitness level. Whether you're a beginner looking for structured workouts or a seasoned rider aiming for peak performance, JOIN creates a personalized training plan tailored to your goals.

JOIN enhances injury prevention with its innovative "Readiness Feature." After each workout, JOIN asks how ready you feel for your next session, taking into account muscle soreness and fatigue. If you're not up for your next activity, JOIN automatically adjusts your plan to prioritize recovery without compromising your long-term progress.

Take control of your cycling journey with JOIN and start your FREE trial today.

When it comes to building fitness, cycling and running are two of the most effective activities. However, if you're short on time, which one provides the best results? 

Whether your goals are to burn calories, improve cardiovascular health, or build endurance, each option offers unique benefits. In this guide, we’ll compare cycling and running to determine which one helps you get fitter faster, both in the short term and over the long run. 

If you want to decide where to focus your efforts for maximum gains, keep reading.

Core Differences Between Cycling and Running

Cycling and running are both popular forms of exercise, each with unique advantages that cater to different preferences. Understanding their differences in terms of time efficiency, muscular impact, and costs can help you choose the best option for you.

Time and Efficiency


  • Cycling is generally more time-efficient for covering distances, allowing you to travel greater distances in a shorter period. This makes cycling an excellent choice for exploring outdoor trails or commuting. 


  • Running, on the other hand, can provide an efficient workout that significantly improves cardiovascular fitness in less time, making it ideal if you’re a time-crunched athlete,

Muscular Impact


  • Cycling is a low-impact exercise that reduces stress on your joints, making it a safer option if you're recovering from injuries or dealing with conditions like arthritis. Cycling primarily engages the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves, glutes, and the core. 


  • Running is a high-impact exercise that works for nearly all muscle groups in the body, including the upper body. While this engagement can improve overall strength, it also increases the risk of joint stress and injury, especially for beginners or if you run with poor form.

Upfront Costs 


  • Cycling typically involves a higher upfront cost due to the purchase of a bike, safety gear (such as helmets and lights), and maintenance expenses. However, cycling can serve dual purposes, functioning as both exercise and transportation, which can help offset some of these costs over time.


  • Running requires minimal equipment, primarily a quality pair of running shoes and suitable clothing. But, you typically need to replace your running shoes every 300 to 500 miles (500 - 800k) which can add up if you’re running a lot. 

Benefits of Cycling

Cycling offers a range of distinctive benefits, including:

Extended Travel Opportunities: It allows you to cover more distance in less time, making it perfect for long rides or exploring new areas.

Joint-Friendly Activity: Its low-impact nature makes it suitable if you have joint issues or are recovering from injuries.

Heart Rate Management: Cycling provides better control for maintaining steady-state cardio or engaging in High-Intensity interval training (HIIT)

Customizable Workouts: You can adjust resistance and speed to meet specific fitness goals.

Versatility: Cycling serves both as exercise and a mode of transportation.

Family Inclusion: Cycling is an activity that people of all ages and fitness levels can enjoy. I absolutely cherish riding with my daughter.

Enhanced Endurance with Reduced Fatigue: Cycling builds aerobic capacity while minimizing excessive strain on your muscles.

Lower Risk of Overuse Injuries: The smooth pedaling motion reduces repetitive stress, making it a safer option in the long run (pun intended).

Benefits of Running

If you’re looking to integrate running into your cycling program, it boasts several noteworthy benefits, including:

Simplicity and Accessibility: Running requires minimal equipment and can be performed almost anywhere.

High Caloric Expenditure: Running is an efficient method for burning calories and facilitating weight loss.

Bone Strengthening: The impact of running helps promote bone density over time.

Cardiovascular Enhancement: It quickly elevates your heart rate and improves overall heart health.

Comprehensive Muscle Engagement: Running works a broader range of muscles, including your upper body.

Mental Health Benefits: It triggers the release of endorphins, which can alleviate stress and boost your mood.

Efficient Workouts: Running delivers powerful results in shorter periods.

Accessibility for All Fitness Levels: The intensity of running can be adapted to accommodate your level of fitness.

Does Cycling or Running Burn More Calories?

The calories you’ll burn varies between cycling and running based on factors such as intensity, body weight, and fitness level. Generally, running burns more calories per hour compared to cycling at a moderate pace due to its weight-bearing nature and greater muscle engagement.

For instance, a 154 lb (70 kg) individual burns approximately:

  • Running (6 mph or 10 km/h): ~ 600-700 calories per hour.

  • Cycling (12-14 mph or 19-22 km/h): ~ 400-500 calories per hour.

At higher intensities, the difference narrows. Cycling at 19 mph (30 km/h) can burn up to 850 calories per hour, which is comparable to running at faster speeds of 7.5 mph (12 km/h) or more.

Comparison of Time Required

To match the calorie burn of 1 hour of running at 6 mph (10 km/h), a 70 kg individual would need to ride for approximately:

  • 1.5 hours at 12-14 mph (19-22 km/h), or 

  • 1 hour at 15-19 mph (25-30 km/h).

This difference highlights the efficiency of running for calorie burn in shorter durations, while cycling may feel less strenuous, allowing for longer sessions.

Which is More Effective for Getting Fit?

Deciding whether cycling or running is more effective for fitness depends on your goals, physical condition, and personal preferences. Here’s a breakdown based on different fitness aspects.

Cardiovascular Fitness

Both activities improve heart health, but running provides a quicker cardiovascular boost due to its higher intensity and ability to elevate heart rate rapidly. Cycling allows for more control over heart rate zones, making it suitable for long-duration, steady-state cardio or interval training.

Verdict: Running is slightly more effective for quick cardiovascular improvements, while cycling is better for endurance-focused cardio with less fatigue.

Muscular Strength and Endurance

Running engages a wider range of muscles, including the core, arms, and upper body, but it places more repetitive stress on your joints. Cycling, being lower impact, focuses heavily on the lower-body muscles, particularly the quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves, thereby building muscular endurance and strength over time.

Verdict: Cycling is more effective for building leg strength and endurance while running provides a full-body workout.

Calorie Burn and Weight Loss

As mentioned earlier, running burns more calories per hour, making it more time-efficient for weight loss. However, cycling can be sustained for longer durations and is easier on the body, allowing for greater overall weight loss during extended sessions.

Verdict: Running is better for calorie burn in shorter workouts, while cycling is ideal for those who prefer prolonged, less intense sessions.

Joint Impact and Recovery

Cycling is low-impact, making it more suitable for individuals with joint issues or those recovering from injuries. Running’s high-impact nature can strengthen bones, but it may also lead to overuse injuries, such as shin splints or knee pain, without proper form and recovery.

Verdict: Cycling is preferable for joint health and recovery, while running offers bone-strengthening benefits.

Practicality and Consistency

Running is simpler to incorporate into a routine, requiring minimal equipment and preparation. Cycling, with its higher initial costs and dependency on weather or terrain, can present logistical challenges, although indoor cycling options can alleviate some issues.

Verdict: Running is more practical for most people, but cycling offers versatility and can serve as transportation.

Overall Effectiveness

If your goal is weight loss or cardiovascular fitness in a short amount of time, running is generally more effective. However, if you aim to build endurance, protect your joints, or engage in longer, less intense workouts, cycling is a better long-term option. 

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual goals and preferences. A combination of both activities can provide a balanced approach to fitness, utilizing the unique benefits of each.

The Efficient Training Solution

When it comes to efficient training, both cycling and running have their advantages, but cycling offers unique benefits for those seeking a well-rounded and adaptable approach to fitness. 

Cycling's lower impact reduces injuries and allows for longer workouts that build endurance without straining the body. However, successful cycling training requires a balance of intensity, volume, and recovery to avoid overtraining and injuries, which are challenges that many cyclists encounter. 

That's where JOIN comes in. JOIN is a world-class cycling training tool designed to adapt to your specific needs, schedule, and fitness level. Whether you're a beginner looking for structured workouts or a seasoned rider aiming for peak performance, JOIN creates a personalized training plan tailored to your goals.

JOIN enhances injury prevention with its innovative "Readiness Feature." After each workout, JOIN asks how ready you feel for your next session, taking into account muscle soreness and fatigue. If you're not up for your next activity, JOIN automatically adjusts your plan to prioritize recovery without compromising your long-term progress.

Take control of your cycling journey with JOIN and start your FREE trial today.

When it comes to building fitness, cycling and running are two of the most effective activities. However, if you're short on time, which one provides the best results? 

Whether your goals are to burn calories, improve cardiovascular health, or build endurance, each option offers unique benefits. In this guide, we’ll compare cycling and running to determine which one helps you get fitter faster, both in the short term and over the long run. 

If you want to decide where to focus your efforts for maximum gains, keep reading.

Core Differences Between Cycling and Running

Cycling and running are both popular forms of exercise, each with unique advantages that cater to different preferences. Understanding their differences in terms of time efficiency, muscular impact, and costs can help you choose the best option for you.

Time and Efficiency


  • Cycling is generally more time-efficient for covering distances, allowing you to travel greater distances in a shorter period. This makes cycling an excellent choice for exploring outdoor trails or commuting. 


  • Running, on the other hand, can provide an efficient workout that significantly improves cardiovascular fitness in less time, making it ideal if you’re a time-crunched athlete,

Muscular Impact


  • Cycling is a low-impact exercise that reduces stress on your joints, making it a safer option if you're recovering from injuries or dealing with conditions like arthritis. Cycling primarily engages the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves, glutes, and the core. 


  • Running is a high-impact exercise that works for nearly all muscle groups in the body, including the upper body. While this engagement can improve overall strength, it also increases the risk of joint stress and injury, especially for beginners or if you run with poor form.

Upfront Costs 


  • Cycling typically involves a higher upfront cost due to the purchase of a bike, safety gear (such as helmets and lights), and maintenance expenses. However, cycling can serve dual purposes, functioning as both exercise and transportation, which can help offset some of these costs over time.


  • Running requires minimal equipment, primarily a quality pair of running shoes and suitable clothing. But, you typically need to replace your running shoes every 300 to 500 miles (500 - 800k) which can add up if you’re running a lot. 

Benefits of Cycling

Cycling offers a range of distinctive benefits, including:

Extended Travel Opportunities: It allows you to cover more distance in less time, making it perfect for long rides or exploring new areas.

Joint-Friendly Activity: Its low-impact nature makes it suitable if you have joint issues or are recovering from injuries.

Heart Rate Management: Cycling provides better control for maintaining steady-state cardio or engaging in High-Intensity interval training (HIIT)

Customizable Workouts: You can adjust resistance and speed to meet specific fitness goals.

Versatility: Cycling serves both as exercise and a mode of transportation.

Family Inclusion: Cycling is an activity that people of all ages and fitness levels can enjoy. I absolutely cherish riding with my daughter.

Enhanced Endurance with Reduced Fatigue: Cycling builds aerobic capacity while minimizing excessive strain on your muscles.

Lower Risk of Overuse Injuries: The smooth pedaling motion reduces repetitive stress, making it a safer option in the long run (pun intended).

Benefits of Running

If you’re looking to integrate running into your cycling program, it boasts several noteworthy benefits, including:

Simplicity and Accessibility: Running requires minimal equipment and can be performed almost anywhere.

High Caloric Expenditure: Running is an efficient method for burning calories and facilitating weight loss.

Bone Strengthening: The impact of running helps promote bone density over time.

Cardiovascular Enhancement: It quickly elevates your heart rate and improves overall heart health.

Comprehensive Muscle Engagement: Running works a broader range of muscles, including your upper body.

Mental Health Benefits: It triggers the release of endorphins, which can alleviate stress and boost your mood.

Efficient Workouts: Running delivers powerful results in shorter periods.

Accessibility for All Fitness Levels: The intensity of running can be adapted to accommodate your level of fitness.

Does Cycling or Running Burn More Calories?

The calories you’ll burn varies between cycling and running based on factors such as intensity, body weight, and fitness level. Generally, running burns more calories per hour compared to cycling at a moderate pace due to its weight-bearing nature and greater muscle engagement.

For instance, a 154 lb (70 kg) individual burns approximately:

  • Running (6 mph or 10 km/h): ~ 600-700 calories per hour.

  • Cycling (12-14 mph or 19-22 km/h): ~ 400-500 calories per hour.

At higher intensities, the difference narrows. Cycling at 19 mph (30 km/h) can burn up to 850 calories per hour, which is comparable to running at faster speeds of 7.5 mph (12 km/h) or more.

Comparison of Time Required

To match the calorie burn of 1 hour of running at 6 mph (10 km/h), a 70 kg individual would need to ride for approximately:

  • 1.5 hours at 12-14 mph (19-22 km/h), or 

  • 1 hour at 15-19 mph (25-30 km/h).

This difference highlights the efficiency of running for calorie burn in shorter durations, while cycling may feel less strenuous, allowing for longer sessions.

Which is More Effective for Getting Fit?

Deciding whether cycling or running is more effective for fitness depends on your goals, physical condition, and personal preferences. Here’s a breakdown based on different fitness aspects.

Cardiovascular Fitness

Both activities improve heart health, but running provides a quicker cardiovascular boost due to its higher intensity and ability to elevate heart rate rapidly. Cycling allows for more control over heart rate zones, making it suitable for long-duration, steady-state cardio or interval training.

Verdict: Running is slightly more effective for quick cardiovascular improvements, while cycling is better for endurance-focused cardio with less fatigue.

Muscular Strength and Endurance

Running engages a wider range of muscles, including the core, arms, and upper body, but it places more repetitive stress on your joints. Cycling, being lower impact, focuses heavily on the lower-body muscles, particularly the quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves, thereby building muscular endurance and strength over time.

Verdict: Cycling is more effective for building leg strength and endurance while running provides a full-body workout.

Calorie Burn and Weight Loss

As mentioned earlier, running burns more calories per hour, making it more time-efficient for weight loss. However, cycling can be sustained for longer durations and is easier on the body, allowing for greater overall weight loss during extended sessions.

Verdict: Running is better for calorie burn in shorter workouts, while cycling is ideal for those who prefer prolonged, less intense sessions.

Joint Impact and Recovery

Cycling is low-impact, making it more suitable for individuals with joint issues or those recovering from injuries. Running’s high-impact nature can strengthen bones, but it may also lead to overuse injuries, such as shin splints or knee pain, without proper form and recovery.

Verdict: Cycling is preferable for joint health and recovery, while running offers bone-strengthening benefits.

Practicality and Consistency

Running is simpler to incorporate into a routine, requiring minimal equipment and preparation. Cycling, with its higher initial costs and dependency on weather or terrain, can present logistical challenges, although indoor cycling options can alleviate some issues.

Verdict: Running is more practical for most people, but cycling offers versatility and can serve as transportation.

Overall Effectiveness

If your goal is weight loss or cardiovascular fitness in a short amount of time, running is generally more effective. However, if you aim to build endurance, protect your joints, or engage in longer, less intense workouts, cycling is a better long-term option. 

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual goals and preferences. A combination of both activities can provide a balanced approach to fitness, utilizing the unique benefits of each.

The Efficient Training Solution

When it comes to efficient training, both cycling and running have their advantages, but cycling offers unique benefits for those seeking a well-rounded and adaptable approach to fitness. 

Cycling's lower impact reduces injuries and allows for longer workouts that build endurance without straining the body. However, successful cycling training requires a balance of intensity, volume, and recovery to avoid overtraining and injuries, which are challenges that many cyclists encounter. 

That's where JOIN comes in. JOIN is a world-class cycling training tool designed to adapt to your specific needs, schedule, and fitness level. Whether you're a beginner looking for structured workouts or a seasoned rider aiming for peak performance, JOIN creates a personalized training plan tailored to your goals.

JOIN enhances injury prevention with its innovative "Readiness Feature." After each workout, JOIN asks how ready you feel for your next session, taking into account muscle soreness and fatigue. If you're not up for your next activity, JOIN automatically adjusts your plan to prioritize recovery without compromising your long-term progress.

Take control of your cycling journey with JOIN and start your FREE trial today.

Unlock Your Cycling Potential Today

Join thousands of cyclists who have improved their performance with JOIN's training plans.

Probeer het nu

Meer Informatie

Unlock Your Cycling Potential Today

Join thousands of cyclists who have improved their performance with JOIN's training plans.

By joining, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.

Unlock Your Cycling Potential Today

Join thousands of cyclists who have improved their performance with JOIN's training plans.

By joining, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and our Privacy Policy.

Join Now

Join Now